Economic arguments for further enlargement of the EU Essay

Economic arguments for further enlargement of the EU - Essay slipThe paper tells that the enlargement of the EU is one of the most debated topics presented to relevant councils. When the European Union was first formed in 1952 there were only six subdivision countries. Today, there are 27 member countries in the European Union, and this number is scheduled to be increased in 2013. The European Union has been inducting newer countries into its council on an sec basis since 1952, after subjecting applicant countries through a long bear upon requiring pre-accession treaties, assessment conditions and a set of criteria the Copenhagen criteria that must be met before membership is granted. The process can take a number of years and after the induction of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007, Croatia is set to become a member of the EU in June 2013. another(prenominal) countries like Turkey, Iceland, and the Western Balkans are in accession negotiations to follow suit. Membership full gene rally offers great benefits to member countries, particularly those struggling to make the move from universe developing nations to being developed ones. The European Union provides an economic and political support that smaller countries, or at least countries with smaller economies, can character to enhance their global standing, both within and outside Europe. But what is the impact that this expansion has, whether on the currently existing members of the European Union, the European Union as a whole, or even, in fact, Europe in general? Surely there must be certain economic and political impact much(prenominal) a membership must have, and economic advantage is generally gained at the expense of another partys disadvantage. While that may be true, and in fact is to a certain point, it is not quite as limited as that. The results of many surveys, reports, and inquests have shown that the general perception among Europes globe seems to be that membership offers great benefits t o newer members while offering bantam to no benefit to older members. This perception might not be in the bulk with statistics varying from country to country there is no doubt that it is a sizable portion of the public, any country or sample considered. Evidence financial support this matter is given further in the report, built generally upon information provided by the British Parliament in 2006. As negative as general perception might be, however, expansion has always shown to result in positive economic and political impact. This is true of any series of expansion, but this report allow for particularly center its focus on countries inducted in 2004, as they have had sufficient time to determine the effect of membership on their economy, as easily as the impact of their membership on the European Union members in general. In fact, not only are the arguments brought forth against expansion generally baseless, with little evidence to support their claim, inverse evidence sh ows that economic arguments supporting the expansion of the European Union are largely misunderstood, or otherwise overlooked.