Equus: A Tragedy On Every Way

In the eyes of realityy, Peter Shaffers genus genus genus genus genus Equus nominate be viewed as a dear a perverse, compound account of a young, psychotic male child. eve so, this bakshis is a calamity. A disaster is a literary transaction in which the principal(prenominal) timber is brought to ruin. Tragedies fundament be classified into deuce electric ray categories: Aristolian tragedies or usual troops tragedies. Equus takes on qualityistics of close to(prenominal) types of tragedies and while it seems to mystify more characteristics of an Aristolian catastrophe, it still holds admittedly to about characteristics of a calamity of a common man.         thither ar many significant points needed in which a literary work can be considered a cataclysm in an Aristolian sense. Some of these points include having a superior athletic supporter with a complex and/or an familiar conflict and a tragicalal flaw. in that respect has to be princ ipals of righteous purchase order and buddy-buddy suffering as salubrious as a favourable decline of the main character. These are just a hardly a(prenominal) of the characteristics needed to cook a work considered an Aristolian calamity. Equus wholly has a few of these qualities. In the play in that location is a protagonist, Alan, even though he is non superior. Alan, has quite a bit of both complex and inner conflict. He is the overlap of a religious, lenient mother and an atheist, exact father. He has to bus with listening to his mothers discussion stories as hygienic as his fathers random comments. Alan is a seventeen-year-old staminate who is not genuinely social and is not very amend in any personal manner. What bittie he does know he has learned from his mother and the short television he watched at the neighbors house. The inner conflict that comes out of this is huge. Alan is a young man who knows closely nothing about the veridical world which caus es him to have a very vivid imaginativeness ! which leads to his ruination. But before Alans d inducefall can be discussed, his tragic flaw essential be taken into consideration. Alans tragic flaw is his deprivation of knowledge. Because of his narrow upbringing, his interpretation of what is ethical and socially acceptable, his lack of experience, and his preference Alan creates his own religion in which his god is a horse. Alans god, Equus, is compared to the Christians god and this questions clean-living order. It is not ruler or right for somebody to faith a horse. Even though Alans worship of the horse does question moral order, it is not really considered evil. It is just considered wrong and unusual. In an Aristolian tragedy the questions of moral order have to do with what is evil kind of than what is wrong irregular. Alan does not have a halcyon downfall in my opinion. He doesnt die or anything of that sort. He does blind six horses which does storm him to see a head-shrinker as sort of a punishment as w ell as a way to seek out a cure only I cannot see where there is a fortunate downfall in the story. Just as Equus can be argued that is whitethorn or may not be an Aristolian tragedy, it can as well be argued that it may or may not be considered a tragedy of the common man. The biggest thing that helps put Equus in the carry of a tragedy of the common man is Alan being a seventeen-year-old protagonist not of supieriority. He is not a major power or prince but he is a common boy. consort to miller, in a tragedy, the main character is attempting to gain his rightful(prenominal) give in society and he has a tragic flaw that is not necessarily kB but merely a weakness. Alan is an example of this. He is part between his religious mother and aethist father. In order for him to tonicity that he has put up his place he creates his own religion. This makes him have that he has founs where he belongs. His tragic flaw is a weakness.

Because Alan is not educated he has a twisted sense of life. Again, he overcomes this by creating his own religion. Because his tragic flaw is only a weakness, Alan has no fortunate fall. Another point that milling machine argues is that the source of a tragedy has to appreciate cause and effect. This is very admittedly in Equus. Because Alan is the result of conflicting parents, he suffers mentally and emotionally. Because Alan is isolated from other children and is limited to the amount of televsion he can watch, he has a vivid and lively imagination which leads to the institution of his religion and his horse-god, Equus. But just as there are examples in Equus that support Millers argument, some of his ideas are not seen in the play. An example of this is when Miller says that tragedy requires a nicer balance between what is possible and what is unacceptable (p. 173). There really is no such balance in this play. Everything that takes place is possible and really not too unrealistic. Equus is a very complex play. It is definitely a tragedy but to put it on a certain category is a difficult task. There is a protagonist character with a tragic flaw and there is a question of moral order which are some of the characteristics of an Aristolian tragedy. But the play lacks a superior protagonist with a fortunate fall. On the other hand, Equus can be considered a tragedy of the common man because Alan is a common boy who fears his parents and doesnt know his place in society. So, Equus is both a tragedy of Aristolian sense and a tragedy of the common man but nevertheless it is still a tragedy. If you pauperism to thwart a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPap! er.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper