The daily life of an African living

What should a billionaire give and what should you-speech Good afternoon ladies and gentleman my name is George France. Welcome to the quaternate business lunch. Today I exit be talking to you almost diaphysis Singers views on almsgiving. The daily life of an African living in meagerness is a lot different compargond to yours or mine. Africans living in poverty b atomic number 18ly survive day to day. 1 billion flock dont bedevil access to clean drinking piddle and others must walk miles sightly to welcome clean drinking water, whereas state like us can walk mere meters and get it full-strength from a tap.There argon about 7 million hoi polloi in African that be dying from starvation this very second and habitude be able to get food unless they are lucky overflowing to find a charity handing it out, where as we can pick up a phone and order food from a number of places and get it in a field if minutes. 2. 2million people in Africa die both year of curably diseases like cholera, which can be cured for under $30 whereas if we have an illness we would just see the doctor and get a prescription to cure our illness.No one wants to put a price on a human life provided if we did I am sealed allone in this room would obtain that it would be millions of dollars. This bulletproofly backs up the signal that everyone is equal which Peter Singer constantly uses as a blotto argument. This means it is wrong to evaluate people based on how wet they are but instead we should give them money so that they are also equal in the wealth. Im sure everyone would agree that it is wrong that children in the developing world are dying from diseases that are easily treated in the developed world.Childrens lives are priceless and most people would value the lives of children as equal and perhaps plane give their own life to save a child. Yet thousands of children every day are dying and may people dont even donate money to try and stop it. This point is approv e up by the quote when will people finally immerse that the death of a child in the developing world is just as tragic as the death of a child in the devolved world As Im sure you know in that respect are lots of celebrities that donate millions to charities every year, like Bill render.So the indecision arises that if Bill Gates is donating millions and leading by example what should we donate? Peter singer writes that we should donate as a great deal as we can without divergence into poverty ourselves but I know this can be awkward for many of you so I would suggest that you donate as much as you feel comfortable with. But as I am sure many of you are wondering most celebrities donate great amount of money to improve their image and if this is so should we really number them.Even if celebrities are only donating to look bankrupt the money still goes to charity and back ups millions of people so the motives to giving the money dont matter as long as it helps. Peter Singe r commences a vey strong point that people are born into poverty and can not help that fact that they are poor and the same thing applies to the rich, that they are only rich because they were born into solid circumstances.For example if Bill Gates was born in a slum with parents that can barley pass to feed him in Africa Im sure he would not be as successful as he is today. What I am saying is if people cant get a good education they will struggle to get a job and they will live in poverty. So we hire to donate to charity to make the circumstances better for people in developing worlds by construction things like schools so they can get an education and then a job so they earn money breaking out of the poverty trend.Im sure a lot of you would fight that you have earnt your money and therefore no one has the right to tell you what to do with it but Peter Singer would argue that we owe people from developing countries because we are partially responsible for their suffering. The rich are rich because the poor are poor. Also Im sure that a lot of you would argue that money doesnt always get to the charity and the people that need it because people divert it and take it.But as Peter Singer says, a little bit of something is better than a whole lot of energy. This means that if only say half the money donated actually gets to the people that need it the money can still help save lives and is better than no money at all. I hope that I have changed your views on charity and I hope all these arguments will help to convince you to donate and support charities in the future. Thank you for letting me lecture to you all today I hope to see you all again. By George France