Tuesday, March 26, 2019
Aesthetics Should Never Take Precedence Over Function Essay -- Archite
Aesthetics Should Never Take precedence Over FunctionFrom the early Greek temples of yesteryear, to the tall-tech autonomous buildings of tomorrow, the perplexity of whether the responsibility of a building or its esthetics qualities are to a greater extent important has plagued the minds of architects around the world. Websters II New College Dictionary (Please do not use the encyclopedia or the dictionary to open your essay--way too high school.) defines aesthetics as The branch of philosophy that provides a theory of the better-looking and of the fine arts (18). The definition of Functionalism is defined by Websters as The ism that the function of an object should determine its design and materials (453). Now, if the function of an object decides the lineament of design and materials used how does one integrate aesthetics into design, and moreover, how important are aesthetics to an architect? bold Lloyd Wright was one of the greatest and most illustrious architects of the 19th and 20th centuries, and while his buildings where lauded for displaying great artistic design, the issue of function was compromised by the blatant fact that his roofs leaked. This is because he let the aesthetics of his buildings mother the focus of the structure, and neglected to adequately address the function of the building allowing for this task to take root in his designs (Palermo, 4 Mar. 1999). As is apparent from Frank Lloyd Wright, there is a certain balance that has to be attained surrounded by aesthetics and functionalism in order for a structure to be appreciated as a successful building.Historically speaking, there have been galore(postnominal) famous architects that have struggled with finding a ratio between aesthetics and functionalism. Le Corbusier is a good example ... ...ly overbearing, but at the same time remaining pleasing to the eye (Palermo, 6 Apr 1999). In conclusion, the turn over between aesthetics and functionalism has been around for a l ong time. It becomes clear however, done research, that the first thing architects consider is function, and so aesthetics. It is because of this approach that aesthetics becomes slightly of a by-product of the whole design process. By looking at examples of various buildings, it is apparent that aesthetics is important to structure and in galore(postnominal) instances has been successfully coupled with function. But in no circumstance should aesthetics take precedence over the function and practicality of a building. It seems more potential that a happy medium between function and aesthetics eject be reached, on a project by project basis, and then applied to the design process of creating the building.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment